Yes, as mimas say , this is a little ironic, 1rst because lxshortcut is a gui which must be initiated by command lines, whitout gui...
2. Because i use Qt to do this.
The correct way would be to finish the work of lxshortcut or I keep my Qt application to do all the job.
If I have some time I will look what I can do, but I feel I am more at ease in Qt - c + + that gtk - c.
@ mélodie,
thank you for pointing out the typo, I'll be sending the version 0.2 again, or I correct in version 0.3 which will increasingly towards a standalone management .desktop.
But lack of time it will gradually. maybe around version 0.7 it will be a standalone version.
but I do not like this idea to work 2 times for same thing, the ideal would be to contact the developer of lxshortcut for that he finish his work completely...